Common Challenges & Considerations in Performing Intention to Treat Analysis

Common Challenges & Considerations in Performing Intention to Treat Analysis

One of the primary challenges in ITT analysis is dealing with deviations from the study protocol, such as missing data, noncompliance, or crossover events. Here’s how to address these challenges effectively. 1. Handling Missing Data Missing data in ITT analysis occurs when outcomes are not available for some participants. This can happen due to dropouts, incomplete responses, or loss to follow-up. To include all randomized participants, strategies for addressing missing data are essential. Common Methods: Complete-Case Analysis (Avoid if Possible):…

Read More Read More

How does Intention to Treat (ITT) analysis compare to other methods?

How does Intention to Treat (ITT) analysis compare to other methods?

To understand ITT analysis more deeply, let’s compare it with other common methods of analysis: per-protocol (PP) and as-treated (AT). 1. Intention-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis Definition: Includes all participants as originally randomized, regardless of adherence to the protocol. Key Characteristics: Preserves the benefits of randomization. Reflects the real-world effectiveness of the intervention. Handles deviations such as noncompliance or dropout by including all participants in their assigned groups. Strengths: Minimizes bias and maintains the initial comparability of groups. Provides conservative estimates of…

Read More Read More

What is a confidence interval (CI)?

What is a confidence interval (CI)?

Confidence intervals (CIs) are used to estimate the range within which a population parameter (e.g., a mean or proportion) is likely to fall, based on sample data. The interval provides a measure of uncertainty or precision around the sample estimate. The key purposes are: Estimate Population Parameters: CIs give a range for the true value of the parameter. Account for Sampling Variability: They reflect how much the estimate might vary from sample to sample. Provide More Information than Point Estimates:…

Read More Read More

What are other model variations that should be considered in using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC)? Part IV (Single vs. Average Scoring)

What are other model variations that should be considered in using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC)? Part IV (Single vs. Average Scoring)

When performing an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) analysis, the decision between using single scorings versus average scorings relates to how you interpret the reliability of measurements and the practical context of your study. The choice affects the estimated reliability and how it applies to future measurements or decision-making. Single Scorings Single scorings ICC (often labeled as ICC(2,1) or ICC(3,1) depending on the model used) assesses the reliability of individual measurements made by a single rater or instrument. It evaluates how…

Read More Read More

What are other model variations that should be considered in using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC)? Part III (Consistency)

What are other model variations that should be considered in using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC)? Part III (Consistency)

ICC (Adjusted / Consistency) is a form of the ICC that measures the consistency of measurements between raters or instruments after adjusting for systematic differences in the ratings or measurements. The “consistency” ICC does not require exact agreement on the measured values but instead evaluates whether the rankings or relative orderings of subjects by different raters are consistent, even if raters are systematically higher or lower than each other. Consistency focuses on whether raters rank subjects similarly or whether measurements…

Read More Read More

What are other model variations that should be considered in using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC)? Part II (Absolute Agreement)

What are other model variations that should be considered in using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC)? Part II (Absolute Agreement)

What is ICC (Absolute Agreement, Not Adjusted)? ICC (not adjusted) / Absolute Agreement refers to one specific type of ICC model that assesses the absolute agreement between raters or measurements without adjusting for systematic differences between raters. This model variation evaluates how close the actual values of the measurements or ratings are to one another, considering both the consistency of ratings and the actual level of agreement. Absolute Agreement examines whether different raters or measurement methods give the same value…

Read More Read More

What is an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC)?

What is an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC)?

In biostatistics, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) measures the reliability or consistency of measurements made by different observers or instruments for the same subject. It is commonly used in contexts like medical studies, psychology, and quality control to assess the agreement between raters or repeated measurements. One of the more commonly accepted classifications for deciding the type of ICC to perform is Shrout and Fleiss’s Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) classification. It is a widely-used framework introduced in their 1979 paper,…

Read More Read More

What are common methods used to measure clinical significance?

What are common methods used to measure clinical significance?

Common measures of clinical significance are used to evaluate the practical importance or relevance of research findings in clinical practice or real-world settings. These measures focus on assessing the magnitude of the effect, its impact on patient outcomes, and its relevance to healthcare decision-making. Here are some common measures of clinical significance: Effect Size: Effect size quantifies the magnitude of the observed effect or difference between groups. Common effect size measures include Cohen’s d for means comparison, odds ratio for…

Read More Read More

What is the difference between statistical and clinical significance?

What is the difference between statistical and clinical significance?

Statistical significance and clinical significance are two distinct concepts used to interpret research findings, particularly in the context of medical and clinical research. Here’s the difference between the two: Statistical Significance: Statistical significance refers to the likelihood that an observed result is not due to random chance but rather reflects a true effect or relationship in the population. In statistical terms, it indicates whether the results obtained in a study are unlikely to have occurred by random variability alone. Statistical…

Read More Read More

What is Confirmatory Factor Analysis?

What is Confirmatory Factor Analysis?

Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) is a statistical technique used to test and confirm the factor structure of a set of observed variables based on a hypothesized model. Unlike Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), which aims to explore and uncover the underlying structure of a dataset, CFA is used to evaluate whether a pre-specified factor model fits the data well. Here’s how confirmatory factor analysis works: Hypothesized Model Specification: Before conducting CFA, researchers specify a theoretical model that represents the relationships among…

Read More Read More